ClearSpot

ClearSpot

AI platform that combines drone photos and on-site sensors to automatically spot problems — like a failing solar panel or a manufacturing defect — without a person having to inspect everything by hand.

🔗 Visit ClearSpot
📁 AI & Machine Learning🗣️ English

Description

Inspecting a large solar farm or a factory floor for problems the old way means someone physically walking the site or manually reviewing hours of drone footage, looking for a hotspot or defect that might be one panel out of thousands. ClearSpot automates that search: its AI looks at drone and sensor data on-site and flags exactly what's wrong and where, so a technician gets sent straight to the actual problem instead of searching for it. ClearSpot ingests real-time SCADA, drone and field data, automatically plans and schedules drone inspection flights, analyzes thermal and RGB imagery for AI-driven fault detection (string degradation, hotspots, inverter losses), prioritizes issues by their estimated revenue impact, and automatically creates work orders routed into a maintenance system. It's aimed at solar asset operators, independent power producers, and industrial/manufacturing quality-assurance teams who need to monitor large physical sites without inspecting every square foot manually.

💬 Our review

The short version: ClearSpot's pitch — using drone + sensor data to find physical problems automatically across large sites — solves a genuine, expensive problem for solar asset operators, but the specific performance numbers it publishes deserve extra skepticism, since the company's own blog explicitly notes some published use cases are illustrative rather than real customer results.

Ranking detected issues by estimated revenue impact (rather than just listing every anomaly equally) is a smart, practical feature — a solar operator managing a large portfolio needs to know which fault is costing the most money right now, not just get a long undifferentiated list of defects. The honest caveat here is unusually direct: ClearSpot's own site states that "use cases presented are for demonstration purposes" with images "sourced from open databases and Google," which means specific figures like "98.4% fleet availability" or "€312K revenue protected" shown as examples should not be read as verified results from an actual customer — this is a young company (founded 2023) still building out its public case-study evidence, and worth confirming any specific ROI claim directly with a live reference customer during evaluation rather than trusting the marketing site's numbers at face value.

💰 Pricing

EnterpriseCustom pricing by customer segment, quote required
Enterprise

📊 Global score

53Average
🌐Availability15/100Faible

1 language · 0 platform

📄Profile90/100Excellent

Profile completeness

🤖 AI-enriched data

💰 Pricing model💳 Enterprise· No public pricing; segmented by customer type (Utility/IPP, C&I, O&M, EPC), quote-only.
👥 Target audienceSolar asset managers | Independent Power Producers | O&M providers | Manufacturing QA teams
🗣️ Languagesen
🌍 Target countriesWorldwide
👍

Pros

Combines drone imagery, sensor data and SCADA in one automated inspection pipeline

Prioritizes detected faults by estimated revenue impact, not just a flat defect list

Automated work-order creation routed into existing maintenance systems

Purpose-built for large-site monitoring (solar farms, manufacturing) at scale

👎

Cons

Company's own site discloses that some published use cases/metrics are illustrative demos, not verified customer results

Young company (founded 2023) with limited independently confirmed track record

No public pricing, fully custom quotes

❓ Frequently asked questions

What kind of problems does ClearSpot actually detect?
Physical faults like solar panel hotspots, string degradation and inverter losses (via drone/thermal imagery), or manufacturing defects, depending on the deployment — flagged automatically instead of requiring a manual site walk or footage review.
How does it decide what to fix first?
It prioritizes detected issues by their estimated revenue impact, so a maintenance team addresses the costliest problems first rather than working through an undifferentiated list.
Are the performance numbers on ClearSpot's website real customer results?
Not necessarily — the company's own blog discloses that some published use cases and metrics are for demonstration purposes with stock/open-database imagery, so ask for a live reference customer during evaluation rather than relying on the marketing site's figures.
Is it worth the money compared to alternatives?
The core problem it solves (manual large-site inspection at scale) is genuinely expensive to do by hand, so the value case is real — but given the company's own caveat about demo content, insist on speaking to an actual reference customer before committing budget.
Which tool should you pick for your case?
Need automated drone/sensor-based fault detection across a large physical site: ClearSpot, after verifying real customer references. Need general on-device AI inference rather than a full inspection platform: Cactus Compute.