Mokka

Mokka

AI recruiting platform that sources, screens and pre-interviews candidates while specifically detecting AI-generated or fraudulent applications.

🔗 Visit Mokka
📁 SaaS & Productivity🗣️ English

Description

As AI tools make it easy for job applicants to auto-generate polished resumes and even fake video-interview answers, recruiters have a newer problem on top of the old one: not just "who's qualified" but "is this application even genuine." Mokka is an AI recruiting platform built with that specific problem in mind — alongside sourcing and screening candidates automatically, it actively checks whether an application shows signs of being AI-generated or fraudulent before a recruiter wastes time on it. Mokka's three-agent system covers sourcing (from 850M+ profiles across 250+ job boards), screening and evaluation (with explainable, auditable scoring), and AI-conducted pre-interviews via voice, text or video, layered with fraud/integrity detection to catch AI-generated responses. It integrates with 100+ ATS systems, and prices per-candidate rather than per-seat: roughly $0.49 per direct-applicant screening and $1.99 per pre-interview, with sourced candidates screened free, plus a $500-3,000 per-job sourcing fee.

💬 Our review

The short version: Mokka's specific bet — that AI-generated fake job applications are now a real enough problem that recruiting software needs to actively detect them — is a genuinely fresh angle in a crowded AI-recruiting market that mostly still competes on plain sourcing/screening speed.

The per-candidate pricing model (roughly $0.49-$1.99 per applicant rather than a flat per-seat SaaS fee) is worth noting on its own: it scales naturally with hiring volume rather than penalizing a company for adding recruiter seats, which is friendlier for a lean team than most competitors' seat-based pricing. Explainable, auditable scoring (rather than an opaque AI ranking) also matters increasingly for compliance, especially under regulations like the EU AI Act that the vendor explicitly claims compliance with. The honest caveat: it's a newer, smaller platform than hireEZ, so its ATS integration breadth (100+ claimed) and Fortune 500 proof points are less independently established — a good fit for a company specifically worried about candidate-side AI fraud or wanting per-candidate pricing, less proven yet at the largest enterprise scale that hireEZ has already demonstrated.

💰 Pricing

FreemiumPer-candidate pricing model, 30-day free trial
Starter Business Enterprise

📊 Global score

53Average
🌐Availability15/100Faible

1 language · 0 platform

📄Profile90/100Excellent

Profile completeness

🤖 AI-enriched data

💰 Pricing model💳 Freemium· Per-candidate pricing: ~$0.49/direct applicant screened, ~$1.99/pre-interview (free for sourced candidates); AI sourcing $500-$3,000/job. 30-day free trial on Starter/Business tiers.
👥 Target audienceTalent acquisition teams | HR leaders | Companies worried about AI-generated fake applications
🗣️ Languagesen
🌍 Target countriesWorldwide
👍

Pros

Actively detects AI-generated/fraudulent candidate applications, a fresh angle in this market

Per-candidate pricing scales naturally with hiring volume, not per-seat

Explainable, auditable AI scoring for compliance (SOC 2, GDPR, EU AI Act)

Three-agent system covers sourcing, screening, and pre-interviews in one platform

👎

Cons

Newer, smaller platform than hireEZ, less proven at largest-enterprise scale

ATS integration breadth (100+ claimed) less independently established

❓ Frequently asked questions

How does Mokka detect fake or AI-generated applications?
It runs integrity/fraud analysis as part of its screening pipeline specifically to flag AI-generated responses or other signs of fraudulent submissions, alongside its normal candidate evaluation.
How is Mokka priced?
Per-candidate rather than per-seat — roughly $0.49 per direct-applicant screening and $1.99 per pre-interview, with sourced candidates screened free, plus a separate per-job sourcing fee.
Does it integrate with our existing ATS?
Yes, it claims integration with 100+ ATS systems, similar to how hireEZ layers on top of an existing system rather than replacing it.
Is it worth the money compared to alternatives?
If AI-generated fake applications are a real problem for your hiring pipeline, Mokka's specific focus there is worth the premium over a generic sourcing/screening tool. For raw scale and enterprise-proven track record, hireEZ has more established Fortune 500 adoption.
Which tool should you pick for your case?
Worried about AI-generated fake candidate submissions and want per-candidate pricing: Mokka. Need enterprise-proven scale across regulated industries: hireEZ. Need deep internal talent-intelligence analytics: Eightfold.